Section 1. Theory that new things are same as old things, thus are accepted
1. The role as tradition destroyer
2. Some say it is OK because it has already done
Section 2. Alpha: Feeling and reason
1. Alpha: Feeling and reason
2. It is not the ethic of de-anthropocentrism or de-racism
3. It does not consider human life as special
4. Some say it is important, but they don't say why
Section 3. Relationships
1. Calling for "somebody"
2. Difficulty of relation-ism
3. As if there were not such things as "Parents"
Section 4.
Another boundary Beta: The World / Internals
1. The World / Internals
2. Humans / Animals
3. Repetition
Chapter 2. Recent past and now
Section 1.
2005: Death with Dignity bill
1. About "based on the voluntary
will"
2. About "only when cureless and at the
terminal-stage"
3. About "it is the movement with
tradition"
Section 2. The 1978 bill and 2003 bill
1. Two bills
2. Tenrei Ota
3.
Change?
Chapter 3. Withdrawing because resource is limited -
what happened in that era
Section 1. For what happened
in that era
1. Rapid, clear but not understandable
change
2. Short circuit
Section 2. In 1980s
1. Criticism on hospital for the aged people
2. A
country that has no bedridden aged person
3. Another
discovery
4. Summary
Section 3. Confirmation
1. Cure or
stay - according to the person in question
2. Cure or stay -
according to the helpers and others
3. Bedridden /
self-supporting
4. The person is holding, but the family
wouldn't
Section 4. "Terminal care of welfare"
1.
"Terminal care of welfare"
2. Seminars / TVs /
the National Diet
3. Those who criticized
Section 5.
Moving to the limited place
1. Economy of medical
care
2. The result
3. Moving to pre-limited
welfare
4. The result
Section 6. Forming the
majority
1. Investigation
2. "Simply prolong
life"
3. Pain
4. Difference of votes
5.
Those professionals
6. Families / the public
7.
The anthropology
Section 7. Economy
1. Agreement from uneconomical
people
2. Accepting waste IS waste
3. Those who
make it occupation
4. Saying reformation will be
economizing
5. The limited realization by claiming it as
insurance
6. "Old old people"
7. We should
reconsider the basic
Chapter 4. Present
Section 1. Spring to summer of 2005
1. Repetition
and others
2. April meeting
3. June meeting
Section 2. March 2006
1. The meeting and the
incident
2. When the person is (regarded as) unconscious
3. About myself
Section 3. Summer of 2006
1. After the
incident
2. The inevitable work
Section 4. At the Ethics
Committee
1. At the Ethics Committee in January 2007
2.
What to tell?
3. At the Ethics Committee in July 2008
Section 5. Diary
1. 2005
2. 2006
3. 2007
4. 2009
Chapter 5. About deciding to die
1. Preconditions although not written
2. Not
"I" vs "we"
3. Things to activate
decision
4. Modifying and announcing
<Appendix>
Books by Yoshihiko KOMATSU
Chapter 6. More painful life, painful life, easy death
1. Uncertain difference between
active action and passive action - agreed
2. Accepting it can
shorten life by easing pain - agreed
3. The difference of
death for easing pain and death for death is effective -
disagreed
4. Choosing life or life, and choosing life or death
is different
5. Summary
<Appendix> What recent
textbooks say
<Appendix> "Principles in Clinical Ethics
- With special reference to Palliative Medicine" by Tetsuro
SHIMIZU
Chapter 7. 0n "Philosophy of Illness"
1. Somebody said something?
2.
The philosophy craving death
3. An experiment to affirm
sick people
4. Solidarity by sick people
5.
Knowing the power of body
*Tateiwa, Shin'ya 2009 Sole Life, Tokyo, Chikuma-Shobo, 418p. ISBN-10:4480867201 ISBN-13:978-4480867209 [amazon]/[kinokuniya]