◆Ashley's Case: The Ethics of Arresting the Growth of Children with Serious Disability
Gary L. Stein Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation Volume 9, Issue 2&3 April 2010: 99-109 全文
◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/61422771.html
◆The curious case of Ashley X.
Kirschner KL, Diekema D, Lantos J, Kemp JD, Doyle E, Mukherjee D, Schalick WO 3rd. PM R. 2009 Apr;1(4):371-8.
◆“It’s Against Nature”
The fifth of six essays on parents’ decisions about children’s bodies.
Kaebnick, Gregory E. Hastings Center Report 39, no 1 (2009): 24-25.January/February Abstract
◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/49352677.html
◆Respecting Children with Disabilities?and Their Parents
The fourth of six essays on parents’ decisions about children’s bodies.
Parens, Erik Hastings Center Report 39, no 1 (2009): 22-23.January/February Abstract
■2008
◆The Ashley Treatment: furthering the anthropology of/on disability.
Battles HT, Manderson L. Med Anthropol. 2008 Jul-Sep;27(3):219-26. Abstract
◆Forever a child: analysis of the Ashley case.
Terry L, Campbell A. Paediatr Nurs.2008 Mar;20(2):21-5. Abstract
◆Clinical ethics: The Ashley treatment: a step too far, or not far enough?
S D Edwards J Med Ethics 2008;34:341-343 Abstract → この議論の概要（作成：堀田義太郎）
◆Revisiting the legal standards that govern requests to sterilize profoundly incompetent children:in light of the “Ashley Treatment,” is a new standard appropriate?
Christine Ryan, Fordham Law Review, September 26, 2008 Abstract
◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/56009864.html
■2007
◆Ashley X.
Kirschner KL, Brashler R, Savage TA. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;86(12):1023-9. Abstract
◆Unjustifiable Non-Therapy: Response to the Issue of Growth Attenuation for Young People on the Basis of Disability
Hank Bersani,Jr., David A. Rotholz, Steven M. Eidelman, Joanna L. Pierson, Valerie J. Bradley, Sharon C. Gomez, Susan M. Havercamp, Wayne P. Silverman, Mark H. Yeager, Dane Morin, Michael L. Wehmeyer, Bernard J. Carabello, and M. Crosser Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities VOLUME45, Number5:351-353 全文PDF
◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/21746393.html
◆Attenuating growth in children with profound developmental disability: a new approach to an old dilemma.
Gunther DF, Diekema DS. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7 Abstract 全文
◆Growth attenuation: a diminutive solution to a daunting problem.
Brosco JP, Feudtner C.
（Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1035-9. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7. ） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1077-8.
◆Growth attenuation by commission and omission may be ethically justifiable in children with profound disabilities.
Ross LF.
（Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7. ） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Apr;161(4):418; author reply 419-20.
◆Closing facilities for children: an unrealistic position.
Grossberg RI.
（Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7. ） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Apr;161(4):418-9 author reply 419-20.
◆Disabling children with disabilities.
Ellis EB.
（Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7. ） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Apr;161(4):419; author reply 419-20.