Tremain, Shelley Lynn


last update: 20700715


 "the 1997-1998 Ed Roberts Postdoctoral Fellow at the World Institute on Disability and the School of Public Health of the University of California at Berkeley and editor of Pushing the Limits: Disabled Dykes Produce Culture, teaches in the Philosophy Department of the University of Toronto at Mississauga."

 Pushing the Limits: An Interview with Shelley Tremain
 The University of Michigan Press


◆Tremain, Shelley ed. 2005 Foucault and the Government of Disability,The University of Michigan Press,362p. ISBN-10:0472068768 ISBN-13:9780472068760 $32.50 [amazon][kinokuniya] ※ ds

◆Tremain, Shelley ed. 20010815 Bodies of Knowledge: Critical Perspectives on Disablement and Disabled Women Womens Press,ISBN-10: 0889612374,ISBN-13: 978-0889612372 [絶版]


◆Shelley Tremain (forthcoming). "The Biopolitics of Bioethics and Disability."
  Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

◆Shelley Tremain (2009). "Alice Domurat Dreger, One of us: Conjoined twins and the future of normal (review)"
 International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics Volume 2, Number 1, Spring 2009, pp. 181-184 DOI: 10.1353/ijf.0.0029

◆Shelley Tremain (2006). "Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in Utero."
 Hypatia 21 (1).

 [Abstract]: This article critically examines the constitution of impairment in prenatal testing and screening practices and various discourses that surround these technologies. While technologies to test and screen (for impairment) prenatally are claimed to enhance women's capacity to be self-determining, make informed reproductive choices, and, in effect, wrest control of their bodies from a patriarchal medical establishment, I contend that this emerging relation between pregnant women and reproductive technologies is a new strategy of a form of power that began to (...) emerge in the late eighteenth century. Indeed, my argument is that the constitution of prenatal impairment, by and through these practices and procedures, is a widening form of modern government that increasingly limits the field of possible conduct in response to pregnancy. Hence, the government of impairment in utero is inextricably intertwined with the government of the maternal body. (shrink)

◆Shelley Tremain (2006). "Stemming the Tide of Normalisation: An Expanded Feminist Analysis of the Ethics and Social Impact of Embryonic Stem Cell Research."
 Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2).

 [Abstract]: Feminists have indicated the inadequacies of bioethical debates about human embryonic stem cell research, which have for the most part revolved around concerns about the moral status of the human embryo. Feminists have argued, for instance, that inquiry concerning the ethics and politics of human embryonic stem cell research should consider the relations of social power in which the research is embedded. My argument is that this feminist work on stem cells is itself inadequate, however, insofar as it has not (...)

◆Shelley Tremain (1996). "Dworkin on Disablement and Resources."
 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Vol.\, No. 2 (July 1996)


◆ Pushing the Limits: An Interview with Shelley Tremain [interviewed by Cathy Marston and Dawn Atkins.]
 Journal International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies
 Publisher Springer Netherlands,ISSN 1566-1768 (Print) 1573-8167 (Online)
 Issue Volume 4, Number 1/January, 1999, DOI 10.1023/A:1023258508993,Pages 87-95

◇作成:堀田義太郎, 箱田徹
UP:20100605 REV: 20100715


TOP HOME (http://www.arsvi.com)