|
>HOME last update:20110310 ■2011 ◆Growth Attenuation in Children in Profound Disabilities Felipe E. Vizcarrondo AAP Grand Rounds 25:36 (2011) Abstract ◇言及http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/62845279.html ■2010 ◆Ashley's Case: The Ethics of Arresting the Growth of Children with Serious Disability Gary L. Stein Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation Volume 9, Issue 2&3 April 2010: 99-109 全文 ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/61422771.html ◆Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Critics Diekema, Douglas S. & Fost N. American Journal of Bioethics Volume 10, Issue 1 January 2010 30-44 Abstract ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/55859613.html http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/56549548.html http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/56549777.html http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/56549859.html http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/56576298.html http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/56595645.html http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/56608290.html http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/58103232.html http://whatsortsofpeople.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/ashley-revisited-american-journal-of-bioethics/ ■2009 ◆Controversy: Agency, duties and the “Ashley treatment” N Tan, I Brassington J Med Ethics 2009;35:658-661 Abstract ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/folder/1769385.html ◆Growth-attenuation therapy: principles for practice. Allen DB, Kappy M, Diekema D, Fost N. Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1556-61. Abstract ◇言及 eLetters to:SPECIAL ARTICLE: Growth-Attenuation Therapy: Principles for Practice Pediatrics 2009; 123: 1556-1561 ・Too Early for Routine Growth Attenuation Garey Noritz (14 June 2009) ・Growth attenuation will not solve the problem Miriam A. Kalichman, MD (18 June 2009) ・limited growth without attenuation Michelle Kuperminc (24 July 2009) ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/52910848.html http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/60070335.html ◆The curious case of Ashley X. Kirschner KL, Diekema D, Lantos J, Kemp JD, Doyle E, Mukherjee D, Schalick WO 3rd. PM R. 2009 Apr;1(4):371-8. ◆“It’s Against Nature” The fifth of six essays on parents’ decisions about children’s bodies. Kaebnick, Gregory E. Hastings Center Report 39, no 1 (2009): 24-25.January/February Abstract ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/49352677.html ◆Respecting Children with Disabilities?and Their Parents The fourth of six essays on parents’ decisions about children’s bodies. Parens, Erik Hastings Center Report 39, no 1 (2009): 22-23.January/February Abstract ■2008 ◆The Ashley Treatment: furthering the anthropology of/on disability. Battles HT, Manderson L. Med Anthropol. 2008 Jul-Sep;27(3):219-26. Abstract ◆Forever a child: analysis of the Ashley case. Terry L, Campbell A. Paediatr Nurs.2008 Mar;20(2):21-5. Abstract ◆Clinical ethics: The Ashley treatment: a step too far, or not far enough? S D Edwards J Med Ethics 2008;34:341-343 Abstract → この議論の概要（作成：堀田義太郎） ◆Revisiting the legal standards that govern requests to sterilize profoundly incompetent children:in light of the “Ashley Treatment,” is a new standard appropriate? Christine Ryan, Fordham Law Review, September 26, 2008 Abstract ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/56009864.html ■2007 ◆Ashley X. Kirschner KL, Brashler R, Savage TA. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;86(12):1023-9. Abstract ◆The Ashley treatment: Towards a Better Quality of Life for Pillow Angels Ashley's Mom and Dad. 2007 (12/06) http://ashleytreatment.spaces.live.com/blog/blog/( 2010/01/17) ◆Unjustifiable Non-Therapy: Response to the Issue of Growth Attenuation for Young People on the Basis of Disability Hank Bersani,Jr., David A. Rotholz, Steven M. Eidelman, Joanna L. Pierson, Valerie J. Bradley, Sharon C. Gomez, Susan M. Havercamp, Wayne P. Silverman, Mark H. Yeager, Dane Morin, Michael L. Wehmeyer, Bernard J. Carabello, and M. Crosser Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities VOLUME45, Number5:351-353 全文PDF ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/21746393.html ◆The Ashley Case: The Public Response and Policy Implications Wilfond, Benjamin S, 2007 (09-10) , Hastings Center ReportSept-Oct，37(5): 12-13. 全文（CBSのサイト） ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/62359341.html ◆Disability and Slippery Slopes Anita J. Tarzian，2007（09-10）， Hastings Center ReportSept-Oct，37(5): 全文（CBSのサイト） ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/62359236.html ◆Investigative Report Regarding the Ashley Treatment Carlson, David R., and Deborah A. Dorfman, 2007 (05/08) http://www.disabilityrightswa.org/news-/Investigative%20Report%20Regarding%20the%20Ashley%20Treatment.pdf (2010.01.17.) ◆The Ashley Treatment: best interests, convenience, and parental decision-making. Liao SM, Savulescu J, Sheehan M. Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 Mar-Apr;37(2):16-20. ◇「アシュリー療法――子どもの最善の利益、利便性、親による意思決定を中心に」（論文全訳：櫻井浩子） ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/21851393.html ◆The Ashley Treatment: Two Viewpoints Shannon, S. E. & Savage, T. A. Pediatric Nursing Vol. 33/No. 2, MAR-April 2007 全文 ◆A Convenient Truth PETER SINGER The New York Times Opinion 2007 January 26, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/26/opinion/26singer.html?_r=1&ex=1188964800&en=5d4a62a8f6b30282&ei=5070 ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/19492166.html ◆Girl, Interrupted: The power to shrink human beings. William Saletan Slate Posted Saturday, Jan. 20, 2007, at 7:06 AM ET 全文 ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/28167689.html ◆Is ‘Peter Pan’ treatment a moral choice? Debate over stunting a disabled child's growth pits comfort against ethics Arthur Caplan updated Jan. 5, 2007 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16472931/%22 ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/13721778.html ◆ 「アシュリー治療の是非について――新しいタイプの生命倫理問題か？」 松井富美男 『ぷらくしす』8(3): 51-60．2007 PDF(2010/01/17） ◇児玉 真美 2007/03/** 「“アシュリー療法”論争」『介護保険情報』2007年3月号 ◇児玉 真美 2007/12/** 「“アシュリー療法”続報としてのKatie Thorpe事件」『介護保険情報』2007年12月号 >TOP ■2006（発端となった論文・議論） ◆Attenuating growth in children with profound developmental disability: a new approach to an old dilemma. Gunther DF, Diekema DS. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7 Abstract 全文 ◆Growth attenuation: a diminutive solution to a daunting problem. Brosco JP, Feudtner C. （Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1035-9. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7. ） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1077-8. ◆Growth attenuation by commission and omission may be ethically justifiable in children with profound disabilities. Ross LF. （Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7. ） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Apr;161(4):418; author reply 419-20. ◆Closing facilities for children: an unrealistic position. Grossberg RI. （Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7. ） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Apr;161(4):418-9 author reply 419-20. ◆Disabling children with disabilities. Ellis EB. （Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7. ） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Apr;161(4):419; author reply 419-20. ◆Growth attenuation: unjustifiable non-therapy. Bersani H. （Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7.） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 May;161(5):520-1; author reply 521-2. ◆Only half the story. Marcus CL. （Comment on: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1013-7. ） Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jun;161(6):616; author reply 616. ◇言及 http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/spitzibara/16446888.html ＊作成：堀田 義太郎・児玉 真美 ＊このファイルは生存学創成拠点の活動の一環として作成されています（→計画：Ⅰ）。 UP:20091231 REV:20100422，1226，20110310 ◇知的障害者の権利 ◇知的障害（者） |