HOME:Ars Vivendi >

Ars Vivendi

Forms of Human Life and Survival


_______ translation by Minoru Kataoka ________

*Solicitation of the plan for establishing the COE (for foreign referees)(MS Word)

Solicitation of the plan for establishing the COE (for foreign referees)
Institution Name : Ritsumeikan University
Institution number : 34315 Serial number E-1

0.
1. Outline of the plan for establishing the COE
2. Objectives, needs/importance and prospective impacts of the COE establishment
3. Plan for research activities
.......1) Describe the concrete targets for achievement in research activities.
.......2) Describe the concrete plan for achieving the above targets. The plan should include answers for the questions below.
.......3) Indicate the achievements of the proposed COE's research activities that show its potential to become a world-class COE.
.........a) Record of the major research achievements that represent the feature of the proposed COE.
.........b) Major scientific publications
.........c) Significant prizes/awards and scientific honors

1. Applicant (President) : Kiyofumi Kawaguchi
2. Application field : E (Interdisciplinary, combined fields, new disciplines)
3. Program title : Ars Vivendi: Forms of Human Life and Survival
Research field : Scientific Sociology & History of Science and Technology
keywords : (Disability) (Aging) (Disease) (Minority) (Support)
4. Department of graduate school (Underline the core department) : Department of Core Ethics and Frontier Sciences, Graduate School of Core Ethics and Frontier Sciences* , The Institute of Human Sciences
*Ritsumeikan University Graduate School of CoreEthics and Frontier Sciences
http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/gr/gsce/index-e.htm

5. Program members: A total of 16 members
Name(Age) Affiliated department, position title Specialized field, Academic degree Division of roles(role for the plan in first fiscal year)

Shinya Tateiwa (46) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of Core Ethics and Frontier Sciences (CEFS)
Sociology
MA of Sociology
* Program Leader

Yoshiyuki Koizumi (52) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of CEFS
Philosophy/Ethics,
MA of Philosophy
* Sub Program Leader (in charge of controlling :Accumulation & Thinking)

Izumi Otani (47) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Faculty of Sociology
Bioethics,
Ph.D

Akira Kurihara (69) ....English/Japanese
Honorary Professor at Rikkyo University (He will become a professor at Ritsumeikan University from April 1, 2007)
Sociology,
MA of Sociology

Masahiko Nishi (52) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of CEFS
Comparative Literature,
MA of Arts

Kozo Watanabe (57) ....English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of CEFS
Cultural Anthropology,
Dr. of Literature

Yoko Matsubara (48) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of CEFS
Science History/ Science and Technology Studies,
Ph.D
* Sub Program Leader (in charge of controlling : Reorganization of Studies)

Akira Endo (59) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of CEFS
Biology
Dr. of Science

Tatsuya Sato (44) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of Letters
Psychology,
Dr. of Literature

Tadashi Nakamura (48) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of Science for Human Services
Sociology
MA of Sociogy

Akira Mochizuki (56) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of Science for Human Services
Psychology,
Dr. of Psychology

Josuke Amada (34) ....English/Japanese
Associate professor at Ritsumeikan University
Sociology
Dr. of Sociology
* Sub Program Leader (in charge of controlling : Cooperation & Construction)

Reiko Goto (49) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of CEFS
Economics,
Dr. of Economics

Paul Dumouchel (56) .... English/Japanese
Professor, Graduate School of CEFS
Philosophy of Science
Political Philosophy
Ph.D

Tatsuo Hayashi (52) ....English/Japanese
Guest professor at Ritsumeikan University
International Aid,
Bachelor of Medicine

Ryozo Matsuda (43) ....English/Japanese
Professor, Faculty of Sociology
Medical Policy, Dr. of Medicine


6. Budget requested (Exchange Rate: USD/JPY=120)

FY 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total amount
Amount U.S.$ 416,667 U.S.$ 583,333 U.S.$ 583,333 U.S.$ 583,333 U.S.$ 583,333 U.S.$ 2,750,000




>TOP

1. Outline of the plan for establishing the COE

Peoples' life is marked by various forms of bodily differences and changes that they experience throughout their existence. It is an important moment of solidarity and gift of people and the same time is made the reason of antagonism. And it is difficulty of individual and is said risk and crisis of society. So it is an essential part that makes and changes people and society. The purpose of our proposed COE is to create a new study that we propose to name "Ars Vivendi: Forms of Human Life and Survival".

Disciplines such as medicine and social welfare study these differences and changes, however they only see what they want to see. In fact there happen much more things in a person's relation to his or her body than what these studies can cover. These phenomena which are in excess of what is studied by classical disciplines, we strongly believe, should be begun studying afresh. Under our proposed COE program, we will inquire into 4 domains: "disability", "aging", "disease" and "difference", accumulate information on these 4 domains, pursue research in each one, reorganize studies. What we mean by "reorganize studies" is that we will reorganize existing knowledge in the light of new studies. We are confident that through doing this we will succeed in producing researches that have depth and broad scope. We will then distribute our results as broadly as possible.

Our proposed COE will focus on continuous research activities carried out on a daily basis and aims at effectively producing researches by graduate students, research fellow and post doctoral fellow. Our goal is not only to collect researches in Japanese but also in English. We propose to target the following 3 research activities.

We will collect information on "body", "disability", "aging", "disease" and "difference". Especially, we will turn our attention to what (has) happened during the modern era and what is now taking place in relation to these topics, as well as what has been said or thought in relation to these key issues. In a second moment, we will disclose in full the collected information and examine its meaning and impact.

We will also give an important place to people who have experienced "differences" and to those who live with them or give them support; they will be included as full participants in research activities and we aim at creating between them a network that makes use of up to date scientific information.

We will examine people who experience difficulties in living in this world and make recommendation concerning how they can best live in public surrounding.

Regarding activity , we will collect and organize research material and make it available to the scientific community and the public at large through our website. The most important information will be posted in both Japanese and English so that it can be made available to a wider public. In addition, we will establish an information network with international organizations to grasp the current situation of these organizations' policies, activities and goals. In this case also we will translate the most important information from Japanese into English, so more people can have the access to it. Once this groundwork has been done, we will organize the various contributions and examine the main theoretical issues involved. As an example of the kind of questions and issues we have in mind we can think of: the extent to which the human body can be changed?

Regarding activity , the point is that the subjects of researches of this type have not been sufficiently developed so far in spite of claims to the contrary. Therefore, we will set up an organization that facilitates communication between subjects and researchers in the field. One of the purposes of this is to improve the educational research environment of people who have disabilities, especially their accessibility to information. The first step will be to reexamine and reestablish the educational research environment of our proposed COE and suggest ways of creating an educational research environment with a greater versatility. We will also examine the mechanisms of the possession, disclosure and distribution of information, such as copyrights for example, and present counterproposals. We think there are two ways to do this. One is to establish a network/organization that enables us to grasp the needs of users and provide the feedback of their evaluations using the contributions of natural scientific research and technological development. The other way is to examine social and natural science studies whose investigation, experiments and research target this kind of population. In addition, we will do research both on the priorities of research/development, the distribution of cost and benefits and propose an outline of how they may evolve in the future.

Regarding activity , we will conduct research in the area of political philosophy and economics in reference to the value of those studies, make our results known to the public and propose concrete plans. We will focus on three objectives. One is to do research which strengthens related activities in the private sector. We will discuss with various persons and organizations including some of our graduate students who are actively engaged in activities of this type, plan and carry out research in collaboration with members of non-profit organizations. We will simultaneously conduct research to improve the management of such organizations and we will widely disseminate our results. Our second objective is to analyze the history and current situation of this domain, including fieldwork, and to make plans for the distribution of resources, elaborate a framework for the reorganization of social services that rests on basic theoretical principles. Our last objective is to focus on attempts that aim to switch to, or promote policies in collaboration with organizations that are involved in direct aid. We will do inquire into the possibility of setting up transnational organizations and a framework for international medical insurance, and propose a system to supply social services at the international level as well a theory of the funding of such a system.





>TOP

2. Objectives, needs/importance and prospective impacts of the COE establishment

1) Describe briefly the disciplines which this proposed COE covers.

As noted in the previous section our proposal is to create a new area of study. In consequence, it is to some extent difficult for us to clarify exactly which disciplines this proposed COE will cover. Yet, we believe proposed COE will cover following disciplines because all of them relate in some way with our proposed COE and with this program members' specialized fields : philosophy, ethics, bioethics, literature, science & technology studies, history of science, anthropology, psychology, economics, political philosophy, sociology, the study of social welfare, social policy, human services, international aid, gerontology and disability studies,. Let us instead briefly explain why we have emphasized certain discipline and what the central characteristic of our proposed COE is.

We have emphasized two of the disciplines so far- disability studies and the study of human services. Regarding the "disability studies", the word "disability studies" first appeared in Japan in the late 1990s. There are academic societies on study of disabilities in the U.S. and U.K. An academic society on study of disabilities was established in Japan in 2003 and Tateiwa, our program leader, who is actively engaged in this society is one of its directors. Regarding "study of human services", Nakamura, Mochizuki, Sato, and others have developed the concept and incorporated it into the curriculum of the graduate school of science for human services at Ritsumeikan University. They are also in the process of establishing an academic society on "the study of human services". These developments indicate that the members of our proposed COE possess the appropriate competence to create and cultivate this new area of study.

Our proposed COE will not directly do research or development in the field of natural sciences but aims to be a "bridge" between research/development in that field and its users. In order to be a bridge, we need members who are researchers in natural sciences and know the "languages" and "concepts" both of natural sciences and social sciences. In our proposed COE, members such as Endo (biologist/ecologist), Matsubara (history of science/science and technology studies), Matsuda (doctor of medicine) and Hayashi (expert of international aid/doctor) perfectly fit that description. Therefore, we are quite confident that we have the resources necessary to be a "bridge" between research/development in natural sciences and users.

2) Describe the concepts and objectives of your plan and the need for establishing the COE.
(How you will build a research base for conducting creative, pioneering research activities of the world's highest standard. What form your COE will take.)

The fundamental idea of our proposed COE is to understand the ways and techniques that are available to people with different bodily conditions (different abilities/disabilities) for them to live, and to develop an image of how they could live from now on. Finally it is to propose actions that can bring about a state of affairs or society that allows them a better life.

The object of our proposed COE is, as noted in 1, to create a new study called "Ars Vivendi: Forms of Human Life and Survival". Under our proposed COE program, we will see people who are characterized by the facts that they have "disability", "aging", "disease", "difference". and accumulate information on these different forms of life and survival, do research on these different conditions, reorganize studies, encourage cooperation and establish collaboration with people actively involved with persons marked by these conditions.

Many people live with various differences of these types. However, previous studies have mainly focused on "normal" people. Of course, studies such as medical science and studies on social welfare deal with people who are sick or live with disabilities. Yet, all these approaches have limitations. In reality, much more things happen in this world, which are beyond the scope of what these disciplines study or can observe. There are people who help and study people who are helped, and they attempt to establish systems of help. But there are also frictions, conflicts and sometimes antagonism between them. However, such phenomena are usually not examined or studied. Thus, our proposal is to examine these types of phenomena and to develop a concept of how their life could be and of how help could and should/should not be provided. Our proposed COE will pursue the 3 following concrete aims.

The first is to know both the history and the current situation in relation to our 4 domains: "disability", "aging", "disease" and "difference". (Disability, aging and disease are difference, but at the same time have other phases, and of course there are other differences within us.)There are a lot of facts and materials that needs to be gathered. Yet those facts and materials have never been assembled so far because most inquiries have been mainly interested in information pertaining to the jobs that cure and care these people.

Also, the implications of this information have not been thoroughly examined. Many academic theses only include some statements of facts and very little discussion. Thus, we strongly believe we will need to collect as much information as possible through collaborative works and collaborative research. Further serious and in depth discussions should be held on the basis of this information.

Our second objective is to create a space and network where people who have experienced such differences and changes or people who have lived with these people can participate in our studies, can use them for their own purposes and produce studies themselves. Although everybody agrees that these persons should participate in the studies, to this date framework and concrete system have not ever been established that allows them to do this actually. Experts many times do not do what is desired and do what is not desired by their 'clients'. In order to solve this problem, we will create a network/organization that includes both experts and the persons they study and that relates them to one another.

Our third objective is to examine people who suffer from these forms of difficulties within the present social arrangement and make normative proposals as to how we change these given living conditions. There are parts of Japan where people with difficulties can live better than similar persons do in other countries. On the other hand, there also are people who live in much harder conditions. Yet everyone has the same right to live and we believe it is possible for us to establish a framework in which all live a decent life.

As for the reasons why we wish to set up this COE we wish to emphasize the following points. It is necessary to examine and show how people struck with such difficulties live, how they should live, how they have lived so far and how they can live in the future. These are obvious requirements, but there has to this date not been any research done on these issues. Since we propose this is precisely the research we propose to do we are convinced of the significance of this research and of our proposed COE. It is necessary and more efficient to have many different studies, but this does not mean that we should simply add and jumble them all together. The important thing is for us to examine the extent to which a person can do, cannot do, should do, and should not do. Therefore, it is necessary and significant that people do not remain confined into their own fields of research but assemble in one center and do research together. This type of research should be done by people with various expertise and by various kinds of people, and we should help these people becoming world-class researchers.


3) What are the most important reasons for establishing your COE in our country? How can it be expanded in the future? From a viewpoint of international standards, what are the COE's most outstanding and/or unique attributes?

The purpose of our proposed COE is to create a new field of study called "Ars Vivendi: Forms of Human Life and Survival". This purpose itself is the most important reason for establishing our COE in our country. Under our proposed COE program, we will see people characterized by "disability", "aging", "disease", "difference", and accumulate information on these 4 types of agents, do research on each type, reorganize existing studies, and encourage collaboration with persons actively helping members of those populations. By doing so, we are confident that we will be able to contribute research that is both in depth and sufficiently broad. Finally, we intend to disseminate our results both in English and Japanese.

In view of the future expansion of our proposed COE we envision the following two steps. As a first step, we will collect facts and information about what has happened in Japan in relation to these issues, what has been thought in Japan concerning the 4 above themes of research. The institutional structure of the humanities and social science in Japan tends to prevent domestic information from going outside. We already have records of facts, research contributions and the contents which we judge important to transmit outside of Japan. Yet lack of resource has prevented us from communicating the information outside of Japan. In order to break free from this situation we need to establish a network and a research center, produce research contributions, efficiently pool them together and quickly translate them from Japanese into English.

Our next step will be to focus on thoughts, actions, goals and techniques that exist outside of Japan but that have not been taken into account in this country. "What kind of transnational dialogue can be produced on the common ground of illness?" is an example. We will concretely determine the circumstances of such a dialogue/discussion and reflect about it together with foreign researchers as well as patients and participants. Then we will communicate these results as widely as possible to make it a shared possession.

Regarding international relations our proposed COE will focus on four dimensions.

First, concerning bioethics, there are research centers such as the Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, the Hasting Center in the U.S. It is thought that since illness is not good we try to cure it. Yet what if illness is cannot be cured? Central to bioethics is the idea of autonomy. But is it the problem of him/herself? Is self-determination only the answer? Bioethics does not cover all aspects of the discussion concerning illness and disability.

Second, concerning study of disabilities, a different approach has been made. There is a center at the University of Leeds in U.K. Researchers in that domain recognize and accept the fact that disabilities cannot be cured. So they require complementation of disabilities by society. But if disabilities can be cured, is it good? These are the type of questions that still remain unsolved.

Thirdly, studies of social policies have been carried out all over the world. This involves such disciplines as economics and politics. Overcoming the immense gap between the rich and the poor is important issue. But, for example, is reduction and management of 'risk' of life an enough answer? It is an issue we need to consider. And how can we change the present situation? We believe that a lot needs to be done.

Finally, philosophy and religion that aim at going beyond life and death are of interest. However, we live in 'this' world while living, so we should understand troubles and conflicts in this world and find ways to live a realistic and concrete life with its passing pleasures and pains.

These reflections are entertained and these questions are asked all over the world. The problem rather is that they are approached separately and that there is no center that addresses all of them together. Our proposed COE aims to establish such a center and become a pioneer in the field. In another word, our proposed COE is unique and has superior attributes from the international perspective.





>TOP

3. Plan for research activities


1) Describe the concrete targets for achievement in research activities.

Our proposed COE will perform the following 3 types of activities (, and ).They are coordinated and linked with each other and together lead to the creation of "Ars Vivendi: Forms of Human Life and Survival".

: Accumulation and Thinking
1. Dissemination of collected data (Part1) : We will collect, pool, order, make accessible materials concerning our 4 themes of research. We will also translate selected materials from Japanese to English.

2. Dissemination of collected data (Part2) : We will establish a database of organizations focusing on the sick people and persons with disabilities, their activities, goals and the policies that address such issues and their current situations.

3. Thinking : We will organize various research contributions and conduct research on our 4 themes focusing on issues that have not been investigated or unsolved problems.
: Reorganization of Studies
1. Educational Research Organizations : People with disabilities will examine and propose organizations to be examined.

2. Assistance of Technology Development : We aim to contribute both to research in natural science and technology development. We will create a network/organization that can convey the intentions of users of scientific advances; that facilitates communication with them, and provide developers with their feedback and evaluations.

3. Ethics of Study and Technology : We will examine the ways in which social science and natural science which investigates experiment and do research on various people, should interact with the people who are targeted by these research activities. Moreover, we will conduct research on the priorities of research/development, the distribution of costs and benefits and reflect the desiderata of targeted people relative to these ends.
: Cooperation and Construction
1. Cooperation : We will discuss with various private organizations, create plans and implement them. Especially, we will focus on research concerning how to run/manage NPO and disseminate this information using our website.

2. Presentation of Visions on Society : We will offer outlines of 1) the distribution of resources, 2) frameworks for social services and 3) supply systems/organizations and propose different conceptions of such systems. At first, we will examine their history and analyze their current situation. We will conduct some fieldwork in order to collect information on these issues. Then we will initiate basic discussions and theoretical discussions and analysis. An example of this type of issues is how we should deal with budget constraints. We will propose concrete suggestions concerning this problem.

3. International Cooperation and Transmission of Information : We will focus on organizations that aim to change or to advance policies of organizations that are directly involved in aid. We will do research on the possibility of setting up transnational organizations and a framework of an international medical insurance and propose a supply system for international social services.




>TOP

2) Describe the concrete plan for achieving the above targets. The plan should include answers for the questions below.
i) How will you create an international COE? (For instance, by building international networks, employing and inviting excellent researchers, international exchange of students and young researchers, cooperating with overseas research institutes, and proactively transmitting information abroad)
ii) What kind of a framework has been established for the researchers who will participate in the COE establishment to liaise and collaborate and make substantive contributions?

Ⅰ: Accumulation and Thinking
1. Dissemination of collected data (Part1)

The area of research of our proposed COE has not benefited from the pooling of information since it exists in a interval between natural science and human and social science. Researchers associated with our proposed COE have already collected an important amount of data concerning several of our research themes here in Japan. We intend to build up this database and translate what we think necessary and important from Japanese into English, which should allow us to play our role as a kind of research hub. We will chronologically organize a research bibliography of related books and articles and at the same time, increase to 20,00 book items ()our database that presently contains 5,000. We will also make files on themes, people, and academic works which we will post on our website. We will also cooperate with researchers of the Social Studies of Medicine program of McGill University in Canada and conduct joint research.

2. Dissemination of collected data (Part2)

We will examine materials and publications that exist in Japan and will translate important ones into English. We will establish a permanent route to the publication of our research in English. We will establish and manage an information base which will allow people to learn about those who are sick, the activities and goals of people with disabilities all over the world and inform them about their current situation throughout the world. We will also do fieldworks on the policies adopted in foreign countries and on various international organizations and report the results of our fieldworks in English. Concerning the collection, ordering and communication of information on these research, graduate students and researchers who have had some experience will take the initiative. We will also cooperate with the Disability Studies Center at University of Leeds and exchange students.

3. Researches

We will organize various research results and conduct research (including collaborative research) on themes that have not been investigated so far and on unresolved problems. We will then publish our result in the forms of books and articles. An example for this issue is that "to what extent should we recognize a condition as sickness/disabilities and to what extent should we endeavor to change people's bodies?".


Ⅱ: Reorganization of Studies
1. Establishment of Education and Research Organizations

We will establish an organization/system that will help and encourage people with difficulties such as disabilities to conduct research. Especially, we will improve the accessibility of information. As a first step, we will examine what can be done based on our past experiences and do repeated research trials. Our goal is to establish such an organization.

Moreover, we will investigate normative problems such as copyrights and patent rights and propose our own conception of how to deal with these questions. This will probably be carried through the initiative of 3 graduate students who have visual disability

2. Assistance of Technology Development

Our research hub itself will not take part in technology development as such. We will observe and convey to those who do such research what users want and what they do not want and also facilitate the exchange between the ones and the others. We will establish a network/organization that can provide developers with feedback about the users' evaluations. An example for this is how should we respond to the claims of genetic medicine?

3. Ethics of Study and Technology

We will examine the question how social science and natural science, which investigate, experiment and carry out researches should treat the people who are the target of its research. Moreover, we will do research on the priorities of research/development and on the distribution of costs and benefits and reflect the points of view of research-targeted agents on these issues.

Ⅲ: Cooperation and Construction
1. Cooperation

We will discuss with various non-profit organizations such as Japan Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis(ALS) Association, Japan National Assembly of DPI (Disables Peoples' International), make and implement investigative research plans. Researchers and graduate students will actively participate in this project and present their research results. We will not only form and keep contacts with researchers, experts, companies, government and citizens but will also conduct research on how the relationships should exist between these different social agents. Especially, we will focus on research concerning how to run/manage NPO such as patient advocacy groups and make this information available to the public through our website.

2. Presentation of Visions on Society

First, we will analyze the current situation, while studying its history and doing fieldwork. Especially, there has not been much research on illness and disabilities. It remains small not only relatively to other domains of inquiry but also in absolute numbers. We will initiate basic and theoretical discussions on e.g. how we should respond to budget constraints. After that we will propose concrete alternative concerning the distribution of resources, and supply systems of social services.

3. International Cooperation and Transmission of Information

We will pursue the possibility of universalizing home care in Japan that some of severely disabled persons and persons with intractable disease can live longer than they do in other countries. We will focus on organizations that are involved in direct medical aids and organizations that aim to change or promote policies on a global level. We will invite a representative of NGO involved with the issue of AIDS in Africa as a Special Visiting Professor beginning in April 2007. Also, we will cooperate with research organizations, researchers and NGO in Asia and Africa. We will pursue the possibility of transnational organizations such as international medical insurance and propose an international social service system.

3) Indicate the achievements of the proposed COE's research activities that show its potential to become a world-class COE.

Regarding the achievements of our proposed COE's research activities that show its potential to become a world-class COE, we would like to emphasize the following eight points.

First, many members of our proposed COE have presented our research results in form of books. For the last 10 years we have published about 40 books as authors or editors of books and as writers of parts or chapters of books we have participated in 100 books. The presentation of research is a normal activity for a research center and the number of books published by members of this demand shows that we have regularly presented research results and that we have the potential to continue to do so in the future.

Second, the core members of our proposed COE have received 43 scientific research funds of which they are research representatives for last 7 years. We have been conducting research on themes that closely relate to our proposed research themes for the last few years. In addition, we have cooperated with research projects from public and private sector. This is an area of research that has been planned by graduate students who have taken the initiative of its development. We have received research grant under the form of collaborative research activities. This indicates that we have experience in the type of collaborative research activities that our proposed COE requires.

Third, several of our members have participated in many of those scientific researches. This indicates that we have experienced collaborative research activities with researchers whose research fields are different from ours. We have held numerous workshops, lectures, meetings and symposiums in collaboration with specialist of domains of research different from our own. Collaboration among members or researchers outside is a must for our proposed COE and we are strongly confident that we have the necessary experiences.

Fourth, we have established and organized an important database. The website of our research hub (http://www.arsvi.com) has about 10,000 data files and receives about 9 million accesses per year (about 200,000 accesses for our top page per year) that is unique in Japan. If we continue organizing the data and adding more information to it our website, it has the potential of becoming of major academic importance. Moreover, we strongly believe that if we make the English version of our website, given its unique character it will attract researchers from all over the world, especially since our proposed COE will make a new field of study. Much of our research contribution can be consulted at the website of our research hub and at the Graduate School of Core Ethics and Frontier Sciences (http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/gr/gsce/index.htm). In order for the proposed COE to be internationally superior, we believe that rapid availability of correct data is required. We are strongly confident that we can succeed in doing this.

Fifth, in the domain of philosophy, history and normative theories, we have invited internationally famous scholars, Jean-Luc Nancy, Alain Corbin, Amartya Sen, Philippe Van Parijs et al., and have held several international symposiums and lectures at our university. We have discussed and established contact with them.

Sixth, members of our research team have established relations with various types of non-profit organizations, relations which over the years have been kept and strengthened. For example, we have had contacts with organizations of people with disabilities and intractable nerve diseases. Some of our members (Tateiwa, Nakamura and Matsubara) have been asked to have lectures at their symposiums and have cooperated with collaborative research activities. Matsubara, using part of her scientific research fund, has held several online discussions with people living with amytrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Seventh, we have had collaborative research activities with NGO active with the issue of AIDS in Africa. Based on information Africa-Japan Forum has accumulated, some of our members have collaborated with graduate students to publish a brochure on this issue. We will have Hayashi, representative of African-Japan Forum as Visiting Professor beginning April 2007 and will expand our members to including researchers from NGOs, universities and think tanks.

Eighth, many of our members(Tateiwa, Nishi, Watanabe, Matsubara, Amada and Gotoh) have participated in COE programs in other universities. This shows that from an objective viewpoint our members have had excellent research credentials in their various research fields. We strongly believe that in order for our proposed COE to be a world-class program, we need to have members with superior research performances and we are confident that we are.

: Accumulation and Research

1. Dissemination of collected data (Part1)

The area of research of our proposed COE has not benefited from the accumulation of information since it exists in a gap between natural science and human and social science. Researchers associated with our proposed COE have already collected an important amount of data concerning several of our research themes here in Japan. We intend to build up this database and translate what we think necessary and important from Japanese into English, which should allow us to play our role as a kind of research hub. We will chronologically organize a research bibliography of related books and articles and at the same time, increase our database that now contains 5,000 items to 20,000 items. We will also make files on themes, people, and academic works which we will post on our website. We will also cooperate with researchers of the Social Studies of Medicine program of McGill University in Canada and conduct joint research.

2. Dissemination of collected data (Part2)

We will examine materials and printed publications that exist in Japan and will translate important ones into English. We will establish a permanent route to the publication of our research in English. We will establish and manage an information base which will allow people to learn about those who are sick, the activities and goals of people with disabilities all over the world and inform themselves about their current situation. We will also conduct fieldworks on the policies adopted in foreign countries and on various international organizations and report the results of our fieldworks in English. Concerning the collection, ordering and communication of information on these research, graduate students and researchers who have had some experience will take the initiative. We will also cooperate with the Disability Studies Center at University of Leeds and exchange students.

3. Researches

We will organize various research results and conduct research (including collaborative research) on themes that have not been investigated and unresolved problems. We will afterwards publish our result in the forms of books and articles. An example for this issue is that "to what extent should we recognize a condition as sickness/disabilities and to what extent should we endeavor to change people's bodies?".

Ⅱ: Reorganization of Studies

1. Establishment of Education and Research Organizations

We will establish an organization/system that will help and encourage people with difficulties such as disabilities to conduct research. Especially, we will improve the accessibility of information. As a first step, we will examine what can be done based on our past experiences and conduct repeated research trials. Our goal is to establish such an organization.

Moreover, we will investigate normative problems such as copyrights and patent rights and propose our own conception of how to deal with these questions. This will probably be carried through the initiative of three graduate students.

2. Assistance of Technology Development

Our research hub itself will not take part in development as such. We will observe and convey to those who conduct such research what users want and what they do not want and also facilitate the exchange between the ones and the others. We will establish a network/organization that can provide developers with feedback about the users' evaluations. An example for this is how should we respond to the claim s of genetic medicine?

3. Ethics of Research Technology

We will examine the question how social science and natural science, which investigate, experiment and carry out researches should treat the people who are the target of its research. Moreover, we will conduct research on the priorities of research/development and on the distribution of costs and benefits and reflect the points of view of research-targeted agents on these issues.

: Solidarity and Establishment

1. Cooperation and Solidarity

We will discuss with various private organizations such as the Japan Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association and the Japan Patient Association, make and implement investigative research plans. Researchers and graduate students will actively participate in this project and present their research results. We will not only form and keep contacts with researchers, experts, companies, government and citizens but will also conduct research on how the relationships should exist between these different social agents. Especially, we will focus on research concerning how to run/manage NPO such as patient advocacy groups and make this information available to the public through our website.

2. Presentation of Visions on Society

First, we will analyze the current situation including its history and the place of fieldwork. Especially, there has not been much research on illness and disabilities. It remains small not only relatively to other domains of inquiry but also in absolute numbers. We will initiate basic and theoretical discussions on how we should respond to budget constraints. After that we will propose concrete alternative concerning the distribution of resources, and supply systems/organizations of social services.


3. International Cooperation and Transmission of Information

We will pursue the possibility of universalizing domiciliary care in Japan given among other things that some of severely disabled persons and persons with intractable disease can live longer than they do in other countries. We will focus on organizations that are involved in direct medical aids and organizations that aim to change or promote policies on a global level. We will invite a representative of NGO involved with the issue of AIDS in Africa as a Special Visiting Professor beginning in April 2007. Also, we will cooperate with research organizations, researchers and NGO in Asia and Africa. We will pursue the possibility of transnational organizations such as international medical insurance and propose an international social service system including the theory of funding.





>TOP

3) Indicate the achievements of the proposed COE's research activities that show its potential to become a world-class COE.

Regarding the achievements of our proposed COE's research activities that show its potential to become a world-class COE, we would like to emphasize the following eight points.

First, many members of our proposed COE have presented our research results in form of books. For the last ten years we have published about 40 books as authors or editors of books and as writers of parts or chapters of books we have participated in 100 books. The presentation of research is a normal activity for a research center and the number of books published by members of this demand shows that we have regularly presented research results and that we have the potential to continue to do so in the future.

Second, the core members of our proposed COE have received scientific research funds of which they are research representatives. We have been conducting research on themes that closely relate to our proposed research themes for the last few years. In addition, we have cooperated with research projects from the private sector. This is an area of research that has been planned by graduate students who have taken the initiative of its development. We have received research grant under the form of collaborative research activities. This indicates that we have experience in the type of collaborative research activities that our proposed COE requires.

Third, several of our members have participated in many of those scientific researches. This indicates that we have experienced collaborative research activities with researchers whose research fields are different from ours. We have held numerous workshops, lectures, meetings and symposiums in collaboration with specialist of domains of research different from our own. Collaboration among members or researchers outside is a must for our proposed COE and we are strongly confident that we have the necessary experiences.

Fourth, we have established and organized an important database. The website of our research hub (http://www.arsvi.com/a/indexe.htm) has about 10,000 data files and receives about 9 million accesses per year (we have got about 200,000 accesses for our top page per year) that is unique in Japan. If we continue organizing the data and adding more information to it our website, it has the potential of becoming of major academic importance. Moreover, we strongly believe that if we make the English version of our website, given its unique character it will attract researchers from all over the world, especially since our proposed COE will make a new field of study. Much of our research contribution can be consulted at the website of our research hub and at the Graduate School of Core Ethics and Frontier Sciences (http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/gr/gsce/index.htm). In order for the proposed COE to be internationally superior, we believe that rapid availability of correct data is required. We are strongly confident that we can succeed in doing this.

Fifth, in the domain of normative theories we have established contact by inviting internationally famous scholars. For example, in both 2002 and 2005 we invited Professor Amartya Sen, Nobel Prize in economics, who participated in two international conferences held at the university. Moreover, we have held several international symposiums and will continue to analyze theoretically and try to make policy theories more concrete.

Sixth, members of our research team have established relations with various types of organizations, relations which over the years have been kept and strengthened. For example, we have had contacts with organizations of people with disabilities and intractable nerve diseases. Some of our members (Tateiwa, Nakamura and Matsubara) have been asked to have lectures at their symposiums and have cooperated with collaborative research activities. Matsubara, using part of her scientific research fund, has held several online discussions with people suffering from amytrophic lateral sclerosis.

Seventh, we have had collaborative research activities with NGO active with the issue of AIDS in Africa. Based on information African Japan Forum has accumulated, some of our members have collaborated with graduate students to publish a brochure on this issue. We will have Hayashi, representative of Africa-Japan Forum as Visiting Professor beginning April 2007 and will expand our members to including researchers from NGOs, universities and think tanks.

Eighth, many of our members have participated in COE programs in other universities. This shows that from an objective viewpoint our members have had excellent research credentials in their various research fields. We strongly believe that in order for our proposed COE to be a world-class program, we need to have members with superior research performances and we are confident that we are.





>TOP

a) Record of the major research achievements that represent the feature of the proposed COE.
b) Major scientific publications (a maximum of five books or journal publications per representative program members, whose names are underlined.)

*For more information, please see http://www.arsvi.com/a/indexe.htm


Tateiwa- a) On Private Property (1997, 531p.), b) Freedom to be Weak: Self-Determination, Care and Technologies of Life and Death (2000, 382p.), c) Equality of Freedom : An Another Simple World (2004, 390p.), d) ALS: Immovable Body and Breathing Machine (2004, 449p.), e) On Hope (2006, 320p.)

a) 『私的所有論』 b) 『弱くある自由へ』 c) 『自由の平等』 d) 『ALS――不動の身体と息する機械』 e) 『希望について』 *) 『所有と国家のゆくえ』

Koizumi- a) Descartes soldat (1995, 268p.), b) Descartes: Protreptikos (1996, 213p.), c) L?vinas (2003, 109p.), d) Philosophy of Illness (2006, 236p.), e) Philosophy of Losers (2006, 194p.)

a) 『兵士デカルト――戦いから祈りへ』 b) 『デカルト=哲学のすすめ』 c) 『レヴィナス』 d) 『病いの哲学』 e) 『負け組の哲学』 *) 弔いの哲学 *) 『なぜ人を殺してはいけないのか?』 *) 『ドゥルーズの哲学』 *) 『生殖の哲学』

Nishi- a)Lafcadio HEarn's Ear (1998, 232p.), b)Guidebook to Creole French (1999, 208p.), c)Nishi & Hara eds. Okinawa's in Plural (2003, 232p.) d)Guerrillas in the Forest: Collected Papers on Kenji Miyazawa (2004, 268p.), e)Lafcadio HEarn's Ear (2): Women around Lafcadio (2004, 230p.)

a) 『ラフカディオ・ハーンの耳』 b) 『クレオール事始』 c) 『複数の沖縄――ディアスポラから希望へ』[no image] d) 『新編 森のゲリラ宮沢賢治』 e) 『耳の悦楽――ラフカディオ・ハーンと女たち』

Watanabe- a) Lévi-Strauss: Structure (2003, 342p.), b) Invention of Judicial Identity: Individual Identity and Registration in the Civil Society (2003, 461p.), c) Watanabe et al. eds. Dictionary of Texts in Cultural Anthropology (2004, 1029p.), d) "Interoger le Spinx: Genèse et structure de la modernité identitaire", Hasumi, S. , Meschonic, H., et al. Modernité après postmoderne, , Maisonneuve & Larose, (2002), e) Watanabe & Fukuda African design: Appliqué in Kuba Kingdom (Democratic Republic of Congo) and Grass Velvet, (2000, 102p.)
a) 『レヴィ=ストロース――構造』 b) 『司法的同一性の誕生――市民社会における個体識別と登録』 c) 『文化人類学文献事典』 *) 『レヴィ=ストロース『神話論理』の森へ』

Matsubara- a) "The Enactment of Japan's Sterilization Laws in the 1940s: A Prelude to Postwar Eugenic Policy," Historia Scientiarum, 8:187-201 (1998) b) Yonemoto, Matsubara et al. Eugenics and Human Society: Where will the Century of Life Science Head to ?, (2000, 286p.) c) "The Reception of Mendelism in Japan, 1900-1920." Historia Scientiarum, 13, pp.232-240 (2004) d) Matsubara & Koizumi eds. Criticality of Life: Life as an Issue (2005, 306p.) , e) "Prenatal Diagnose and Bioethics", Jyosanzasshi, 59, pp.138-141 (2005)

b) 『優生学と人間社会――生命科学の世紀はどこへ向かうのか』 d) 『生命の臨界――争点としての生命』

Sato- a) Sato & Mizoguchi Complete History of Psychology in Japan (1997, 650p.) b) Acceptance of Development of Psychology in Japan (2002, 681p.) c) Sato & Takasago Reading the Flow of History of Psychology (2003, 201p.) d) New History of Psychology (2005, 228p.), e) IQ in Question (2006, 179p.)

a) 『通史 日本の心理学』 b) 『日本における心理学の受容と展開』 c) 『流れを読む心理学史――世界と日本の心理学』 d) 『心理学史の新しいかたち』 e) 『IQを問う――知能指数の問題と展開』[no image]

Amada- a) Sociology of Aging and Frailty (2003, 608p.) b) Freedom for the Frail Elderly: Social Theory of the Elderly Care from the User's Viewpoint (2004, 394p.) c) "How is Resistance Possible?: On Constructionism and Its Predicaments", Japanese Sociological Review, 55-3, pp.223-243 (2004) d) "The (Im)possibility of "Fundamental Affirmation" in Dual Destiny", The Annual Review of Health and Medical Sociology, 17-2, pp.12-27 (2007) e) Sociology of Aging and Frailty, 2nd edition (2007, 615p.)

a) 『〈老い衰えゆくこと〉の社会学』 b) 『老い衰えゆく自己の/と自由――高齢者ケアの社会学的実践論・当事者論 e) 『〈老い衰えゆくこと〉の社会学 普及版』

Gotoh- a) Suzumura & Gotoh Amartya Sen: Economics & Ethics (2001, 310p.), e) Economical Philosophy of Justice: Rawls and Sen (2002, 466p.), c) Shionoya, Gotoh & Suzumura eds. Public Philosophy of Welfare (2004, 324p.), d) Tachibanaki, Gotoh etc. Life in Risk Society (2004, 206p.) e) Sen, A. & Gotoh Dialogue between Welfare and Justice (be published soon)

a) 『アマルティア・セン――経済学と倫理学』[no image] b) 『正義の経済哲学――ロールズとセン』 c) 『福祉の公共哲学』 d) 『リスク社会を生きる』

Dumouchel- a) Dumouchel & Dupuy, Jean-Pierre L'enfer des choses: Rene Girard et la logique de l'economie (Seuil, 1979. Japanese translation 1990, German translation, 1999), b) Emotions. Essai sur le corps et le social (Paris, Synthelabo, 1995. Second edition 1999) c) Violences, victimes et vengeance Quebec (Presses de l'universite Laval, 2000), d) Dumouchel & Ross, Don "Emotions as Strategic Signals," Rationality & Society, September, 2004, e) "Trust as an action,"European Journal of Sociology, XLVI-3, pp. 417-428 (2005)

a) L'enfer des choses: Rene Girard et la logique de l'economie 物の地獄――ルネ・ジラールと経済の論理[no image] Die Hoelle der Dinge. Rene Girard und die Logik der Oekonomie[no image] b) Emotions: Essai sur le corps et le social[no image]

Matsuda- a) Nomura & Matsuda Introduction to Economics of Medicine (1997, 155p.), b) Ujihira, Matsuda et al. eds. Health Promotion and Assistance (1999, 239p.) c) "Globalization and Health Medical Policies from the "Bottom"", Kokuminiryokenkyujyo eds. Medical Policies of 21st Century, pp.97-115 (2003) d) Ichida, Matsuda et al. "Social Capital and Public Health," Public Health 69(11), pp.914-919. (2006), e) "Comparative Medical Policies under Globalization," Tanaka & Niki eds. International Comparison of Medical Policies, pp.143-167 (2007)

a) 『わかりやすい医療経済学』[no image] b) 『健康づくりと支援環境――健康日本への視点』[no image] c) 21世紀の医療政策づくり[no image] e) 医療制度改革の国際比較



>TOP

c) Significant prizes/awards and scientific honors (Indicate the name and year of the prizes/awards and scientific honors received by the representative program members.)

1. Incentive Award of the Third Japan Sociological Society (Books) in 2004
Amada- Sociology of Aging and Frailty

2. New Face Award of Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology for Selection and Recommendation of Art in 2004
Nishi- Lafcadio HEarn's Ear (2): Women around Lafcadio



UP:April 2007 REV:April 7, 2007/April 8, 2008/April 9, 2008/April 14, 2008/September 4, 2008
**Ars Vivendi(in Japanese)

TOP HOME(http://www.arsvi.com/a/indexe.htm)**