"Genetic Intervention and the Question of Inclusion"
HOTTA Yoshitaro
last update: 20151222
Genetic Intervention and the Question of Inclusion
HOTTA Yoshitaro
Abstract:
This paper analyzes the problems and contradictions inherent in the arguments held by the proponents of genetic intervention. Specific emphasis is placed upon the current discussions of disability within the US.
First, I examine the so-called "compatible view" between genetic intervention advocates and disabilities rights advocates, and show that this view is erroneous. In fact, genetic intervention and disabilities rights are mutually exclusive; genetic intervention cannot be socially or legally justified.
Second, my paper criticizes the thesis that aims to "devalue disabilities, not people with disabilities." This claim is often seen as justifying genetic intervention because of its "logical validity" and the "absence of discriminative intension." I examine this argument by focusing on the logic of discrimination, and show that the "logical validity" and the "absence of discriminative intension" are delusions in themselves. In conclusion, I insist that the fundamental problem is the opposition between the responsibility for the people with disability and the vested interest in the cost of non-disabled people.
Key Words: Genetic intervention, Inclusion, Foreclose, Contradictions of compatible view, Practices of modifying society
REV: 20151222